Supreme Court Sides With Republicans Again in Campaign Ad Rate Dispute
The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of Republicans for a second time on Wednesday in an emergency dispute regarding television advertising rates ahead of the midterm elections.
FTMQ Politics, written by our newsroom0 views
The United States Supreme Court sided with Republicans for a second time on Wednesday in a legal battle over campaign advertising costs ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Reuters, The Hill, and The New York Times all reported that the decision marks another ruling in favor of the Republican Party regarding political television ad rates. [1][7][9][10][11][12]
The Washington Examiner reported that the Supreme Court reversed what was called an inappropriate lower ruling in a Federal Communications Commission fight over favorable campaign ad rate rules. According to Courthouse News Service, the decision in the dispute was issued through the high court emergency docket, which has increasingly played a role in partisan litigation prior to elections. [4][6]
Two liberal justices dissented from the decision, according to The Hill. Courthouse News Service noted that the ruling involved a war over television ad rates related to campaign efforts supported by Donald Trump. [6][7]
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary and holds ultimate appellate jurisdiction over federal legal questions. The court routinely decides emergency applications and lower court appeals affecting national federal regulations. [13]
Separately on Wednesday, The Hill and Courthouse News Service reported that the Supreme Court weighed arguments in an internet tracking case regarding a 1980s video privacy law. The Edwardsville Intelligencer also reported that the court declined to hear an appeal from a lobster fisherman opposing mandatory boat tracking. [2][3][5]
In short
- The Supreme Court ruled for a second time in favor of Republicans in a dispute over campaign ad rates.
- Two liberal justices dissented from the decision.
- The decision reversed a lower court ruling in an FCC fight over favorable ad rate rules.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]US Supreme Court again backs Republicans in clash over political ad ratesReuters, 20d ago (the report this story comes from)
- [2]Supreme Court weighs scope of 1980s video privacy law in internet newsletter ageThe Hill, 20d ago
- [3]Supreme Court declines to hear the case of a lobster fisherman who opposes boat trackingThe Edwardsville Intelligencer, 20d ago
- [4]Supreme Court reverses ‘inappropriate’ ruling in FCC fight over favorable campaign ad rate rulesWashington Examiner, 20d ago
- [5]Consumers take early lead in Supreme Court showdown over internet privacyCourthouse News Service, 20d ago
- [6]Supreme Court sides with Trump in war over TV ad rate for midtermsCourthouse News Service, 20d ago
- [7]GOP gets another Supreme Court win in TV political ad fightThe Hill, 20d ago
- [8]Republicans can confirm a Supreme Court justice if Democrats take the Senate, but at what cost?The Conversation, 20d ago
- [9]Supreme Court Again Sides With Republicans in Political TV Ad FightThe New York Times, 20d ago
- [10]Supreme Court Again Gives Republicans a Win in Ad Rate DisputeBloomberg Law News, 20d ago
- [11]Supreme Court sides with Republicans in dispute over cost of campaign adsLos Angeles Times, 20d ago
- [12]US Supreme Court backs Republicans for second time in TV advertising dispute — The HillUA.NEWS, 20d ago
Background
- [13]Supreme Court of the United States on Wikipedia
- [14]Republican Party (United States) on Wikipedia
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 14 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
Related from FTMQ Politics
Earlier reports of ours on the same people and subjects.
- Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow Big Bend wall constructionWhite House, 13d ago
- Vivek Ramaswamy ends television campaign advertisement featuring opponent motherTop Stories, 5d ago
- Supreme Court to consider federal habeas corpus limits in upcoming argumentCourts, 3d ago
- Michael Whatley halts television advertising in North Carolina Senate campaignCongress, 20d ago
- Trump suggests Senate Republicans might refuse to seat Mary PeltolaWhite House, 5d ago
More in Top Stories
- Israeli election deadlock leaves Benjamin Netanyahu and Gadi Eisenkot short of majority6h ago
- Justice Department targets 20 Democrats in Alaska election investigation6h ago
- Iran says decision rests with United States to prevent wider war6h ago
- US midterm campaign spending is projected to reach nearly 12 billion dollars1d ago
- Michigan early voting surges as candidates hold final midterm rallies1d ago
- Thomas Massie criticizes Senate candidate Mike Rogers over young people claims1d ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.

Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.