Supreme Court to consider federal habeas corpus limits in upcoming argument
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Guerrero v. Johnson regarding when state prisoners can file second federal post-conviction review petitions.
FTMQ Politics, written by our newsroom1 view

The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on November 4 in the case of Guerrero v. Johnson, SCOTUSblog reported. The case centers on the limited circumstances in which a state prisoner can return to federal court for a second round of post-conviction review. [1]
State prisoners seeking to challenge the grounds for their detention must typically file a habeas claim. According to SCOTUSblog, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 established strict limits to curb the overall number of those petitions. [1]
Under a specific provision of the 1996 law, a new claim in a second federal habeas petition is barred unless it meets one of two statutory exceptions, SCOTUSblog reported. The justices will debate when an established rule is considered previously unavailable to a petitioner. [1]
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary. It holds ultimate appellate jurisdiction over federal cases and state court cases that involve questions of constitutional or federal law. [2]
In short
- The Supreme Court scheduled oral argument in Guerrero v. Johnson for November 4.
- The case addresses limits on state prisoners seeking a second round of federal habeas review.
- The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 restricts successive federal habeas petitions.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]Justices to debate when an established rule is “previously unavailable” in habeas caseSCOTUSblog, 4d ago (the report this story comes from)
Background
- [2]Supreme Court of the United States on Wikipedia
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 2 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
Related from FTMQ Politics
Earlier reports of ours on the same people and subjects.
- Supreme Court hears arguments on federal sentencing guideline commentaryCourts, 16d ago
- Supreme Court to hear dispute over Intel retirement fund investmentsCourts, 30d ago
- Supreme Court declines cases on school dress codes and gun rightsCourts, 29d ago
- Supreme Court Sides With Republicans Again in Campaign Ad Rate DisputeTop Stories, 20d ago
- New York court hears oral arguments in September 11 lawsuitTop Stories, 27d ago
More in Courts
- Supreme Court sets January calendar for jury and zoning disputes1d ago
- Custodia Bank asks Supreme Court to review Federal Reserve account denial1d ago
- Ninth Circuit allows TPS protections to resume for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans3d ago
- Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein dies at 92 after long career6d ago
- Spokane defends city resolution against former state representative in federal court6d ago
- Delaware judge limits French president defamation suit against Candace Owens6d ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.

Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.